Remember, revising is the third stage of our writing process. In terms of the total time spent on a writing project, it should make up 50%-60% of the efforts.
As a part of our revision process for this paper, we participated in a peer review. We said that a peer review can be beneficial in many ways. Here is your chance to reflect on how our peer review can help or has helped you revise your draft.
Please respond to the following questions in your comment:
- How have you revised in the past? Did you spend 50% of your time on this process?
- Name and explain two strengths that the peer review revealed about your paper.
- Name and explain two things that the peer review exposed about your paper that needed improvement.
- Other than peer review, what revision technique(s) will you use for this paper or in the future?
1.In the past I have simply gone through the paper and looked for spelling and grammar errors. Obviously this is incorrect but its difficult to look for your own mistakes. And I have never spent 50% of my time on a paper doing so.
ReplyDelete2.N/A
3.N/A
4.Other than peer review, what revision technique(s) will you use for this paper or in the future? N/A
-SeanP
1) when revising in the past all i would do is reread everything. I just wanted to know if it made sense. After that i then used spell check. It never took long to do at all so i deffinatley didnt spend that much time on it.
ReplyDelete2) it hasnt been done yet on my paper. but with this technique it gives the chance for another set of eyes to look at it. Also people can give ideas on what can be improved on.
3) it hasnt been done yet. by my one sided mind will probably get opposed in ideas and detai. Also i may need to learn to take more time to look over.
4) the other techniques ill probablt use for my papers in the future is post draft outline.
Well, what I've done is go through my paper and make sure it was flowing in corect order. I don't know if I was successful, we haven't had peer review yet. I feel pretty good about my paper, I think I did a good job. This is my first time ever writing a paper. I went through and made sure there weren't any spelling errors. I hope that I did this correctly. I followed the techniques as closely as I could. I would welcome peer review very much, just to give me an idea of how to write a paper properly.
ReplyDeleteI have revised in the past but not very often. Just during my time in school was really the only time I ever had to revise something. Did I spend 50%of the time on this? I’m not really sure. Most likely no. unless I did a really bad job on my paper. I haven’t had my paper peer reviewed so yet so I can’t really answer the next 2 questions. Another review technique I might use is just simply finding more details or ideas to add on to the work I have already done. If of course it makes it more understandable to the reader.
ReplyDeleteJon Luther
I have revised papers in the past, but have never spent 50% of the time on it. I can now see how important it is to take more time in the revision process.
ReplyDeleteI didnt have a draft with me for the peer review, but I can say that it would probably give you another set of eyes and definetly another opinion to consider. Some things that we dont see someone else could catch. Two heads are better then one.
One of my friends read through my draft for me and pointed out that I wasn't really explaining my topic sentences, although they weren't bad, I tended to stray from the point a bit. And I should have used a little more detail explaining them as well.
Im going to use the "Read aloud" method. It makes more sense to me when I hear it instead of just reading it silently.
The way that I have revised in the past is by just reading over the paper myself because I always felt like my paper was going to be good enough or sound dumb. I basically just looked for spelling errors and maybe adding a couple words to make more sense. I did not spend 50% of my time on this process because I didn't think that I needed to add anything more that it always sounded good the way I wrote it the first time.
ReplyDeleteTwo strengths that the peer review revealed about my paper was that it was in a clear organizational way and that it sounded good by having unity throughout the paper.
Two things that peer review exposed about my paper that needed improvement was to try to use more transition words and use better topic sentences.
The revision technique that I would use for this paper or papers in the future other than peer review would be to read aloud/backwords to make sure that it makes sense or pick out details that I missed and fix them.
I would say yes I have revised in the past…… but to be honest I definitely did not spend 50% of the time on that. My peer review showed me that my paper wasn’t as bad as I thought it was, that I had a clear and strong development of the ideas I had. I was told it made sense, and that alone is a plus for me! The review revealed that I should put the page number in my paper where I am finding these quotes so it makes it easier for the reader to go back in the story if they choose to do so to check the context. Another thing I was told I may think about changing is the fact that I put my opinion of how crazy the author of The Tell Tale Heart is, in the end of the story. My peer suggested that it isn’t necessary because the author does a pretty good job of that himself….. I think the peer review was a good form of checking your work, and wasn’t nearly as bad as I thought it would be. I think in the future I want to try to use the scissor method, even though it will take some time I think it sounds pretty cool. I will have to give that a try when I have more time…..
ReplyDeleteUsing the Techniques you provided upon me has helped my pre-writing work. It seems I can look and review stories from different aspects of point of views. I can look at one point and see the facts on how a guy like Micheal Myers can be judged from a sick mental charchter, who's abilities can get looked over. Or you can look at Micheal Myers in an aspect of being unpredictable monster. These two statements that I just expressed, was one of the techniques, you taught me so far, thats broaden my writing and expanding on topics in details. I also been confirmed in good ways as far as my drafting and pre-writing thats from experiance. I look foward to learn more skills in my english through out the semester. Thank You.
ReplyDeleteThis is Alison Slater.
ReplyDelete1. In the past I have spent a lot of time editing my papers, having teachers and parents look over my papers, but never needed a lot of fixing according to them. I probably have spent close to or over 50% of my time revising my papers.
2. My use of transition words was very well spread throughout my paper, and I knew how to write a Conclusion according to the peer revising of my paper.
3. The peer revising didn’t really expose any need for improvement in my paper.
4. I’m going to send my paper to be looked at by a specialist in the academic support center for further advice on my paper and I already had my mom look at my paper as well.
This is Katlyn Wilkie
ReplyDeleteI have revised in the past but I don’t think I have spent 50% of my time or more on revising no. Two strengths I have from the peer review is unity and sentence/paragraph clarity. Two things that need to be improved development as in to be more specific with my examples along with sentence structure in some places. Other than using revision, another technique would be to read out loud and to proofread.
Tanya Dominguez
ReplyDelete1.In the past I have revised by fixing the problems only noticed by my teachers and spelling I have misspelled. I spent little time in revising my paper so I'm gonna be real honest, I only wasted like 20% of my time on it. I figured if my paper only had little mistakes to fix then I should just fix them and move on.
2.Two strengths that the peer review revealed about my paper is that my paper had a lot of good examples from the story. Which supported the thesis and the details were descriptive to the examples. Another strength is that my intro and conclusion was tied to the thesis were in the intro it asked the research question and in the conclusion it restated the thesis.
3.Two things that the peer review exposed about my paper that needed improvement was in the details I have to make important sites in the story where I started describing the examples. Another improvement is in my conclusion, I just have to make it more specific in the end and maybe come up with alternate conclusions.
4.Another revision technique I will use other than peer review is put away, another day and read aloud/ backward methods. I have used these methods before but I guess I never realized I was using them.
1. I usually just reread it over and over again to fix stuff that i missed. I spend at least an hour doing that task.
ReplyDelete2.& 3. I amsorry i did not make it to class on Thursday, personal dilemmas.
3.I like using the circle the details revision techniques, because i can really see how i used my transistions and details. Put away for another day is a good one too that i will use in the future. Because i tend to write my papers as soon as i get the assignment.
1. In the past when I needed to revise I would read it to myself aloud over and over correcting mistakes as I went along. I feel that I put over 50% effort in my revision’s. I have been called and over achiever , but I would rather over achieve than under achieve.
ReplyDelete2. My peer really didn’t have the chance that night to mention any of my strengths, we mostly worked on
what she felt needed improvement, and we used the remainder of the time so I could tell her what I found
regarding her work.
3. My peer found one of the obvious that was some spelling and punctuation , but she felt that I needed to be more stronger in proving my thesis statement more.
4. I will continue to do what I do best and that would be to continue reading my work aloud to see what corrections need to be made.
1: The way I have revised in the past was just rereading, switchng some things here and there, and then print. I don't think it was 50% prob. like 15%.
ReplyDelete2: Peer review gave me like one strenghth. It was that I had a good topic sentence for my last paragraph.
3: Peer review pointed out that I needed to have a topic sentence as my first sentence in each paragraph. Also Suggest that I need to cut my sentences short because they tend to run on.
4: In the future I will have a couple people proof read my essays. I will have them tell me what needs to be changed. I also will have topic sentences and try to go more into detail. As for the run on sentences. lol I'll have to try not doing that, but I love talking so it kinda makes me do it.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete1. How have you revised in the past? Did you spend 50% of your time on this process?
ReplyDelete* I didn't spend that long on doing it because I went about a whole different way of writing until I attended your class. When I proof read my own reports, essays, etc. I always ended up moving my ideas around or even tweaking them in order to get to the point without losing track of what I was writing about.
2. Name and explain two strengths that the peer review revealed about your paper.
* I was sick and couldn't attend class so I can not be able to answer this question, But I can talk about past situations. In other situations where I had someone review my paper it helped to see if i needed to separate paragraphs or if i added to much (rambling).
3. Name and explain two things that the peer review exposed about your paper that needed improvement.
* I am unable to answer this question due to me being sick and resulting in missing my class.
4. Other than peer review, what revision technique(s) will you use for this paper or in the future?
* I pretty much answered that in questions 1 & 2 I believe.
*In the past I just re-read over my papers and looked for grammar and spelling errors. I would re-read everything to see if it makes since to me. I never spent 50 % of my time on the revising process.
ReplyDelete*The peer review didn’t help me. They told me I had a few grammar mistakes here and there and needed to write a little more. When I went to the Academic Center and they read over my paper; I was told the opposite. So the peer review didn’t help me at all. I don’t think everyone can re-read a paper.
*The peer review didn’t help me at all. I think I’m going to stick with going to the Academic Center.
*I will use a draft outline and when re-reading I will read out loud.
1. I have always done revision in the past. I was never really content with just writing something and accepting it as the absolute best it can be. Granted, I did not spend 50% of my time on the revision, but it was the part I enjoyed the most. Maybe because it feels like most of the leg work is done and all that is left is to toy around with ideas and the flow of it until it was just right.
ReplyDelete2. The peer review showed me that I was well organized with plenty of transitional phrases. It also showed me that I had some well developed ideas that were fairly clear and concise.
3. I also found out in the peer review that some of my ideas still needed a little more explaining. Additionally, I found where I had slightly veered away from the thesis without knowing it. It’s not that the ideas and details weren’t relevant; they were just presented directly supporting the thesis.
4. Other than the peer review I am a big fan of the 72-hour revision technique. It really does give you a fresh set of eyes to see your paper with. I also may try the technique where you summarize a paragraph with one sentence and see if it supports the thesis to ensure unity.
1.) The way in which I revised in the past was by reading out loud and asking someone else to proof read as well. I do not think that I spent 50% of my time revising but, I was pretty close to that and now even closer.
ReplyDelete2.) A strength that my peer review exposed was I had a good thesis. For the second strength I guess my grammar and punctuation did not need a lot of corrections.
3.) The first thing peer review exposed is that what I understand when I write someone else may not. So, I was told to explain a little more so the reader could understand better. The second improvement would have to be using a different technique to grab the readers attention.
4.) I can say that the peer review is the least of my favorite revising technique to use. The best revising technique for me is reading allowed. Putting your paper away…….another day is another preferred method I like to use. I tend to get a lot more ideas this way and it also helps the grammar portion a lot to.
1.In the past I would just read over my paper and make sure I had correct punctuation and make sure things made sense. I wouldn't really check for anything else and I definitely would not spend 50% of my time on revising.
ReplyDelete2.The peer revealed that I had good unity and organization.
3. The peer review showed me that I needed to work harder on the development part of the paper. I needed to put more ideas in each paragraph and explain thing a little better to help support the thesis.
4.In the future I think I will use techniques like putting it away for another day and circle the details/transitions to help me revise my papers.
I can't really remember writing many papers in the past that required much revision. Since I've started college though I have used revision a couple times. I had to revise my COM paper a couple times, tweaking it a little more each time until I felt it was complete. I had spent around 50% revising it.
ReplyDeleteI havn't finished my draft yet so i didn't get to have a peer review. Im not sure of the other revision techniques.
Yes I have spent more than 50% of the time on revision. I think it makes the paper stronger. The peer review helped me to spot little inconsistences that I had overlooked. But overall yes I would use somewhat of the same revision techniques that has been shown and clarified so it makes it easy to zip through and spot where I can make improvments.
ReplyDeleteIn the past i have never fully revised a paper other than the grammatical errors that i would find. I often skipped revising because i was too lazy to go over and look for places to add or take out things and i was writing papers the night before they were due. My partner didn't write anything on my paper and read it and said i dont know what to do so i was able to get his thoughts about it. Other techniques i would use would be putting it away for a day or two and re-read it, hand it over to some people to get their inputs on it and continue with what I'll have.
ReplyDelete1. I've never revised a paper, until now. I read through the paper a few times and often would repeat a cluster of sentences to check for unity, and structural development. As I'm aware it's a rough draft, it was a fairly thoroughly written. Upon careful inspection I did note a few grammatical, and punctuational errors.
ReplyDelete2. I thought the sentence structure provided the topic in a re-inforced manner.
I also thought that the ideas meshed well among the paragraphs, and the flow of the ideas presented.
3. My peer showed me that my draft lacked unity, because I have not developed a full introduction.
My peer also showed me that because of the lack of unity, I also lacked structure and unity.
4. I'm thinking that I will re-read my paper several times and see how ideas flow from paragraph to paragraph.
In the past revising has just been spell checking and making sure my punctuation was correct. I would say I only spent about 5% of my time revising when it should have been far more. When my paper was peer reviewed, I was told that one of my strengths was re-enforcing my topic. I was also told that I had good sentence structure. I did however have some weaknesses. Organization seems to be one of my major weaknesses, along with grammatical errors. In the future I want to use peer review as a revision tool. I tend to look over large mistakes purely because I already know what it is supposed to say. I also plan to spend more time revising than I have in the past.
ReplyDeleteIn the past I have I have generally not used any revision processes on my papers.I used to be a procrastinator who would wait to the last minute to write papers. I not only tried to get the paper right on the first try,but I had to get it right on the first try. Unfortunately, I was not always successful.There were at least two positive elements that were revealed about my paper through peer review. My thoughts were clear and concise, and I had well developed topic sentences.
ReplyDeleteTwo negative elements that were revealed about my paper were that I needed more work on my introduction and my conclusion. They needed to tie into the facts of my paper a little better.
Other than peer review, I think other revision techniques that I might like to use are reading my paper out loud,and putting the paper away for a couple of days then rereading it.
1. In the past I just looked over my paper to see if there were any discrepancies with grammar, punctuation, and if the main ideas and supporting details made sense. Before this class I didn’t spend over 50% of my time on revision. I would spend the most time in writing the rough draft and final drafts.
ReplyDelete2. Two strengths that peer review revealed about my paper was that it was in a clear organized manner and did have unity throughout the paper. I had good supporting details with clear explanations relating back to the thesis.
3. Two things that peer review exposed about my paper that needed improvement was a couple sentences needed to be revised by rewording and some punctuation corrections.
4. Other than peer review, I will use the technique “put away another day”, to revise my paper Just to see if there is anything I can clear up or other ideas that might strike me to put in. Basically making it make more sense to an outside reader.
In the past i have revised my papers but not on the scale that you have tought to us. When revising a paper i would mostly just read through what had a writin, check the spelling and grammer, and add some words that i thought would help the paper. Even after making these changes to a paper i know that it didnt consist of 50% of my work time.
ReplyDeleteDuring the peer view my classmate pointed out that i was able to show many great details at certain points in my wrting. He also was impressed with the vocabulary i used when describing the situation my protagonist was in.
Two things the peer view exposed about my writing is that while i used nice details at certain points in my writing i failed to explain other parts as detailed as i could have. Also my classmate pointed out that i could have addressed the thesis statement and how it pertained to the story in more detail.
For this paper and on future papers i plan to use the put it away for a day technique. I feel this will allow me to clear my thoughts and come at my paper with a fresh my set.
When I usually revise a paper it takes me a little bit of time. But it doesn’t take up to much of my time. I mostly spend it on the sentences, and how the sentences sound. Do they go together ; are they connecting right. It probably takes up to about thirty -five percent of my time to do it. When it came to doing the peer review, was not comfortable doing it and I was the same way in high school. I just always wanted an adult opinion about my work. The only thing that I would ever let one of my peers do is read it. But I would never be able to take advice from them. The few times that I had actually tried taking advice didn’t work because they were always doing something wrong in the way they wrote their essays. Then my teachers would tell me not to take any advice from them. That they may give it , but never to reinforce it into my work. But as I sat there I kept going through my paper , and finding that the whole thing just needed to be rewritten. And that sometimes happens when I look over a paper that I have written. It was also another reason why I didn’t let anyone else look at my paper was because it was so badly written. And to me sense its been about two years since I have written a paper of any sorts for English, I guess you can say that I was a little bit embarrassed because I knew I could right so much better than that.. But in the future I will probably use the same reproving techniques that I used in the past. And maybe even add a couple of new strategies to my learning.
ReplyDeleteThe only peer review I have done in the past is read what I wrote right after I was finished so I could pick up on any gramtical errors. So I did not spend 50 percent of my time doing this. From the peer review I found the strengths tha I have in my writing are that I get some good solid details but also need to work on relating them to eachother and making the paper flow better. Another weakness that I found in my writing through peer review is that I need to find stronger details to help prove my point and move the paper along. I will probibly use the put away another day method when I reviewy paper again because it really helps if you get out of the train of thought you were in then go back in a different mind frame and really pick it apart.
ReplyDeleteIn the past when I wrote an essay I would just go through it and make sure spelling was correct and my sentences made sense. I wouldnt say I spent 50 % of my time reading over it maybe 35%. I also didnt do the peer review because I didnt have my draft in class the day we did the peer review.Next time I write a paper im going to make sure I bring it to class for peer review and also read over it more then once.
ReplyDelete1. The only revising that I have done in the past was basic proofreading for misspelled words. I spent around five to ten percent of my time on revision.
ReplyDelete2. Two strengths that peer review revealed about my paper were unity and that the paper was precise and concise. My paper had paragraphs that related to the topic sentences, and my sentences were clear and detailed.
3. Two things that peer review exposed about my paper that needed improvement was my conclusion and use of proper citing.
4. Other than peer review, the revision techniques that I will use in the future will be the paramedic method, read aloud/read backwards, “put away… another day…”, and post-draft method.
In the past my revision consisted of reading my paper again for mistakes or things i forgot. Most on the time I would spend a whole 5-10 minutes on revision.
ReplyDeleteThe peer review revealed that both my intro and conclusion are strong. It also pointed out that my topic sentences are pretty well done.
The peer review also pointed out i placed my topic sentence in the wrong spot. I had more of a transition sentence explaining i'm going from one paragraph to the next one.
The other review i'll us will obviously be looking for spelling and grammer mistakes this time. However next time i'll probably look for more ways to review it so as I will have a better understanding on what my paper is really doing!
Andrew Sawyer
Bryan Shaw,
ReplyDelete1. In the past, revision was just a quick read of the writing after I printed it out. This time I believe that I did spend at least 50% of the time revising.
2. Two strengths the peer review gave me were, a different point of view and time away. The review gave me the view of someone who had never seen the ideas before and could judge the writing more effectively, and accurately. The time away helped me to clear my mind from the paper but still improving it with someone else’s help, which helped me get a better look at it when I came back to it.
3. Two things the peer review helped me in my paper were clarity and organization. When someone else read the paper they were able to tell me whether or not the paper made sense. The second area was organization where the reader helped me organize my thoughts better, and organize my paper in a logical and coherent form.
4. Other than peer review I can improve my review by taking time away from the paper, and coming back to it at a later date, giving me fresh ideas. I could also do a post draft outline.
1. I have revised in the past. I usually just went through a fixed any spelling and/or grammar mistakes. Also i would just re-read and see if there are some points that don't make sense
ReplyDelete2. No offense to the students but im not sold on peer review. I just dont see the point in having a person who is in the same level of english i am. He/She could be the smartest person on the class, i just don't understand it.
3.N/A
4. Personally i think that besides peer review, theres not many other forms of review(such as proof read, spelling, and grammar).
1. How have you revised in the past? Did you spend 50% of your time on this process?
ReplyDeleteNo. Even though it should be a major part of the paper It was never required in school. It was just look it over and submit the work.
2. Name and explain two strengths that the peer review revealed about your paper. Two strengths were the grouping of the paragraphs were good. Also, I was told that the symbols I chose were the best I could use.
3. Name and explain two things that the peer review exposed about your paper that needed improvement. Needed to be longer. Paper was kind of short. Conclusion paragraph needed to be redone,
4. Other than peer review, what revision technique(s) will you use for this paper or in the future? I would like to try scissors
1. I have always revised my work in the past. However, I did not spend 50% of my time revising my work.
ReplyDelete2. Two strengths that peer review revealed about my paper are the ideas are my thesis statements that I have further explained in my body paragraphs and also the transitions of my paper as a whole.
3. The peer review also revealed things that I needed to improve on. My introduction and conclusion.
4. Other than peer review, I will be revising my work by circling details, reading my work aloud and maybe also putting it away for the day and coming back to it another day to look at it in a new way.
When I have revised in the past I have usually just looked it over for spelling errors and simple sentence structure errors.
ReplyDeleteThey said that I had a good flow with my paragraphs and good describing details. I had the same general idea in each paragraph. I also would give an example then emphasize it with a direct quote from the story.
I need to have an attaching sentence between the two paragraphs that have the same facts. I have to remember to cite.
I will read my paper backwards and out loud to catch any mistakes.
1.How have you revised in the past? Did you spend 50% of your time on this process?
ReplyDeleteIn the past I did it quick or skipped it. Did not spend 50% of the time.
2.Name and explain two strengths that the peer review revealed about your paper.
Another person taking a look at it can give ideas on what can be improved.
3.Name and explain two things that the peer review exposed about your paper that needed improvement.
Did not use it yet.
4.Other than peer review, what revision technique(s) will you use for this paper or in the future?
Other than peer review is to take the right amount of time in between drafts.
1)1.How have you revised in the past? Did you spend 50% of your time on this process?
ReplyDeleteThe only way I have revised in the past,was by just re-reading a few times to see if anything caught my eye.Then I would change whatever didn't sound right,and this would only take about half an hour if that.This would be done right before class.
2)Name and explain two strengths that the peer review revealed about your paper.
My paper was long enough(lol),and that I didn't over do the paragraphs with alot of garbage so to say.
3)Name and explain two things that the peer review exposed about your paper that needed improvement.
Did not use it yet
That I needed to work on my topic sentencing.The one's that I had weren't really topic sentences.
I also didn't have enough idea's in each paragraph.That the more the better.
4)Other than peer review, what revision technique(s) will you use for this paper or in the future?
Other than peer review is to take the right amount of time in between drafts.
i will read the paper over a few times and then put it away.Bring it back out after a few days and re-read it,to see if I could change anything or if I had better idea's than the first.
In the past, my revision techniques consisted of going through the paper and reading it over, and correcting sentence-level skills. By sentence-level skills I mean correcting things such as spelling errors, grammar errors, and just changing a few words around. I would say revising was about 15% of my time was spent revising. At first I was a bit worried of the peer review. I was a bit embarrassed to have another student to read my paper in fear that they wouldn’t think that it was up to par with their own paper. However I was pleasantly surprised by having a few other people read my paper. I found that having other people read your paper is a plus because you can get another persons perspective from their point of view. Another benefit of peer review is that they can come up with ideas for you paper that you may not have. They also may find grammatical or spelling errors that you skipped over. Peer review exposed a few things to me. One being that I used way too many commas, and made many errors with quotation marks. Through peer review and suggestions, I was also able to better tie my sentences together. In the future, I will definitely use peer review again, I found this to be one of the most useful revision techniques. Besides peer review, I will also read through my paragraphs, and make sure the topic sentences relate and introduce the rest of the paragraph correctly. I will also cut each paragraph out, and put them together in different orders to see if that will help improve the flow of the paper.
ReplyDelete1. In the past I have only spent about 15% of my time on revision. My past revision technique consisted mainly of correcting grammatical and spelling errors.
ReplyDelete2. During peer revisions two strengths found in my paper were good detail development and clear and concise paragraphs.
3. Two weakness' were unclear topic sentences and an incomplete/weak introduction.
4. In the future other than peer review I will use the read aloud/backwards technique and also check for unity and clear topic sentences.
In the past i never really revise my paper usually just a spell check. During peer revisions a strenght in my paper was details. Weeknesses were not long enough and not a good intro. I will use the read outloud and backawrds technique in the future.
ReplyDeletei spent most of my time on this part of the essay. yes
ReplyDeleteit not good to text while driving. and it also not good to talk on the phone while driving.
need to find more research.
find more research and for the future i will start my papers using this method
yes i have revised in the past mostly i just write my essay and proof read then i change what i think dosnt fit, or sound right. the peer review showed me ideas that i myself didnt have. it showed me that i do have run on sentances. other than the peer review i could just re read my papers several times im bound to find somthing new every time
ReplyDelete1) I dont think i revised very much in the past
ReplyDelete2) i didnt do the peer review
3)" "
4) well i didnt do the peer review so i will deffinatly wanna do that
i didnt ever revise my papers before once they were done they were done i didnt go back to check for errors or if the story made sense.
ReplyDeletewhen we did the peer reveiw i come to find that my thesis wasnt clear and that my paper was trailing off in spots from what the reader thought the main idea of the paper was. so it helped me set things straight and fix the things that needed to be fixed.
i most likely will end up writing the paper then set it down for 72 hours then go back and read it to see if what i wrote was on topic and to the point